Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of First Instance summarily assessed post-judgment costs, allowing specified sums for an Order 14 application and appeal after a broad-brush review of the parties' submissions.
The court granted reduced maintenance pending suit and interim maintenance, rejected backdating, and awarded costs to the Petitioner.
The High Court refused a stay pending appeal from a specific discovery order, finding no arguable ground of appeal and no shown irreparable prejudice.
The Family Court dismissed a father's ex parte application to vary interim access, holding that the relief lacked extreme urgency and involved material non-disclosure.
The Family Court granted the wife HK$500,000 in further maintenance pending suit and litigation funding for the resumed ancillary relief trial, subject to strict payment conditions.
Maintenance pending suit and interim child maintenance were assessed on a broad-brush basis, with the court ordering HK$6,812 monthly MPS and maintaining HK$15,000 child maintenance.
The District Court granted maintenance pending suit in part, ordering monthly maintenance for the wife and child, and awarded costs to the wife.
The variation summons was dismissed because the defendant relied on settlement offers expressly stated to be full and final settlements of all claims while there had been no final adjudication on liability or quantum; therefore the offers could not be meaningfully compared with the interim costs order and the application was premature; the interim costs order was made absolute and the defendant ordered to pay the summons costs.
Source excerpt
The Family Court ordered the Husband to pay HK$20,000 monthly maintenance for the Wife and Child, disallowed a lump-sum relocation claim, and kept the mortgage undertaking.
The court refused leave to appeal against an interim litigation funding order, holding the husband had sufficient financial resources and no arguable error was shown.
Explore more
