Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Property law [2026] HKDC 759

CHAN CHIK LAM AND ANOTHER v. UPJET LTD

The District Court granted possessory title by adverse possession over the Lots, rejected illegality and public policy defences, and dismissed the counterclaim.

  • Factual possession
  • Animus possidendi
  • Illegality defence
  • Government lease breach
  • Unauthorised building works
  • Trespass
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] HKCFI 2098

OLDHAM, LI & NIE, SOLICITORS (A FIRM) v. MELVIN WAXMAN AND ANOTHER

The High Court allowed amendment of a legal-fees claim in part, rejecting strike-out, but refused fraud amendments for lack of affidavit support for service out.

  • Amendment of statement of claim
  • Striking out for no reasonable cause
  • Service out of jurisdiction
  • Retainer agreement
  • Estoppel by convention
  • Limitation defence
Read case analysis
Property law [2026] HKDC 609

YUENG KWOK LEUNG AND ANOTHER v. GOLDEN KINGDOM INVESTMENT LTD

The District Court dismissed an adverse possession claim over a garden strip, finding the plaintiffs failed to prove exclusive possession and the required intention for 12 years.

  • Adverse possession
  • Possessory title
  • Factual possession
  • Animus possidendi
  • Limitation ordinance s7/s17
  • Adverse-possession
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] HKCFI 1871

MAXWELL ROAD LIMITED v. MO AH MAN

The Court of First Instance dismissed the defendant’s appeal, allowed most proposed pleading amendments, and held the pre-July 2019 investment-related pleas could proceed.

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Assignment of causes of action
  • Limitation period
  • Inconsistent alternative pleas
  • Standing to sue
  • Breach of trust
Read case analysis
Disability discrimination [2026] HKDC 290

TUNG LAI LAM 同時代表30萬的香港精神病患者 對 東網有限公司及另三人

The strike‑out and refusal of relief were mandated because the pleaded claim was time‑barred under DDO s82(1) and Limitation law, the aspects directed at the successor corporate defendant were barred by res judicata (prior final determination in DCEO 5/2009), the claim against the website operator constituted an abuse of process (Henderson v Henderson principle) with no realistic prospect of success, the claimant failed to establish an appropriate defined representative class, recusal and anonymity were unsupported, and costs and a restrictive litigation order were justified by repeated, unme…

  • Ddo sections 46,49,72,82
  • Order 18 strike‑out (r19)
  • Order 15 representative proceedings (r12)
  • Res judicata / henderson v henderson
  • Limitation (limitation ordinance cap.347)
  • Recusal / apparent bias test
Read case analysis
Property law [2026] HKDC 302

HO KWOK WA v. WONG SOOK JIN

Default judgment was granted in an adverse possession claim over part of a Yuen Long lot, with declarations extinguishing the defendant’s title and awarding costs.

  • Adverse possession
  • Limitation ordinance cap.347
  • Default judgment
  • Declaratory relief
  • Substituted service
  • Adverse-possession
Read case analysis
Property law [2026] HKDC 264

CISSIE SUEN MIU LING, also known as SUEN MIU LING CISSIE v. KONG YUEN LING AND ANOTHER

District Court case on vacant possession and adverse possession of a Kowloon flat, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove a tenancy and the second defendant proved adverse possession.

  • Vacant possession
  • Adverse possession
  • Animus possidendi
  • Hearsay admissibility
  • Default judgment
  • Declaration of possessory title
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.