香港長城投資有限公司 v. 施鶴平
法院認為本案涉及簽署真偽等重大事實爭議,不適合只憑誓章以原訴傳票處理,遂依 O.28 r.8(1) 轉為按訴狀程序處理並保留訟費。
- Board resolution validity
- Forgery of signatures
- Notarial certificate validity
- Service out of jurisdiction
- Summary determination procedure
- Damages
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
法院認為本案涉及簽署真偽等重大事實爭議,不適合只憑誓章以原訴傳票處理,遂依 O.28 r.8(1) 轉為按訴狀程序處理並保留訟費。
Explore more