Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil law [2026] HKCFI 2876

UBE SINGAPORE PTE LTD v. TONGX CO., LTD AND OTHERS

The court held D1 and D3 liable in unjust enrichment after a fraud-induced payment of US$998,750 was sent to D1 and partly traced to D3, and continued a Mareva injunction for six months.

  • Unjust enrichment
  • Tracing
  • Mareva injunction
  • Post-judgment relief
  • Mistake
  • Substantive restitutionary remedies
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] HKCFI 1886

HE WEI v. ZHAO JIANGONG

The Court dismissed a Hong Kong forum non conveniens stay, upheld service as of right, and refused late fresh evidence about a PRC action.

  • Forum non conveniens
  • Service of process
  • Choice of law
  • Admission of fresh evidence on appeal
  • Jurisdiction
  • Bank transfers
Read case analysis
Restitution [2026] HKCFI 1870

WAH TAI HING FOODS MANUFACTORY LTD AND ANOTHER v. FOK CHIU MING MILTON AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance ordered restitution against a defendant who received misappropriated funds, rejecting bona fide purchaser and change of position defences.

  • Unjust enrichment
  • Bona fide purchaser for value without notice
  • Change of position
  • Domestic illegality (amlo)
  • Foreign illegality (prc forex regulations)
  • Matching balances
Read case analysis
Contract [2026] HKDC 586

CHIANG CHI HANG v. JIANG RONGHUA

The District Court found a refund agreement for cryptocurrency transfers, held the defendant in breach, and awarded the plaintiff US$252,397.33 in damages.

  • Specific performance
  • Damages
  • Estoppel
  • Misrepresentation/representations
  • Hearsay admissibility
  • Service of documents
Read case analysis
Restitution [2026] HKDC 452

金子楷 對 格萊國際控股有限公司及另一人

The court found the HK$199,900 received by the second defendant was traceable to the plaintiff’s funds misappropriated by fraud, that the receipt constituted unjust enrichment, and the second defendant failed to prove she was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice; accordingly the second defendant was ordered to repay HK$199,900 with interest and to pay the plaintiff’s costs (subject to specified legal aid charge and assessment rules).

  • Bona fide purchaser for value without notice
  • Tracing of funds
  • Freezing/freeze orders
  • Interest on judgment debt
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2026] HKCA 221

CHUGAI PHARMA USA, INC. v. CHENG YAN AND OTHERS

Hong Kong Court of Appeal upheld summary judgment ordering return of HK$5.99 million, finding the appellant’s loan-repayment defence was not believable.

  • Summary judgment (order 14)
  • Constructive trust
  • Resulting trust
  • Tracing
  • Bona fide purchaser for value without notice
  • Conditional leave to defend
Read case analysis
Civil law [2026] HKDC 40

GUSTAVO ALFREDO RUBIO v. WANG YU AND ANOTHER

Default judgment was entered for the plaintiff in an internet fraud case, with restitution of US$59,800, constructive trust relief, interest, and costs.

  • Unjust enrichment
  • Constructive trust
  • Default judgment
  • Service of process
  • Pre-judgment interest
  • Costs assessment
Read case analysis
Company law [2026] HKCFI 276

CHINA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC AND OTHERS v. WU XIAODONG AND OTHERS

The Court of First Instance found that senior CMED officers orchestrated sham FISH and SPR transactions to misappropriate funds, with liability findings across fraud, conspiracy and receipt claims.

  • Directors' duties and proper purpose
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Knowing receipt
  • Unjust enrichment
  • Unlawful means conspiracy
  • Fraudulent trading s.275 cwumpo
Read case analysis
Company law [2026] HKCFI 276

CHINA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (IN LIQUIDATION) v. WU XIAODONG AND OTHERS

Trial judgment on sham FISH and SPR transactions, with findings of fiduciary breach, conspiracy, fraudulent trading, dishonest assistance, knowing receipt and unjust enrichment.

  • Fiduciary duties
  • Breach of trust
  • Unlawful means conspiracy
  • Fraudulent trading (s.275 cwumpo)
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Knowing receipt
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.