Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Torts [2026] HKDC 697

陳华玲 對 黃漢邦

Court fixed PSLA at HKD 400,000 because injuries (right tibial plateau fracture, tibial shaft spiral fracture and fibular head fracture requiring ORIF and prolonged inpatient treatment and physiotherapy) were serious but achieved satisfactory healing and functional recovery per joint orthopaedic expert; pre-trial income loss rejected for lack of supporting documentary evidence and claimant's likely retirement/limited labour-market prospects; family care claim rejected for lack of evidence of market value and hours; specific special damages proven and quantified to HKD 359,267 (excluding QEH i…

  • Damages assessment
  • Special damages
  • Interest
  • Expert medical evidence
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Arbitration [2025] HKCFI 4245

LAM PO YEE v. YU SHUI MUI

The Court of First Instance dismissed a stay summons, holding the plaintiff failed to prove any applicable arbitration agreement and had already acted on the merits.

  • Stay of proceedings
  • Third party rights
  • Arbitration agreement
  • First statement on substance
  • Discovery of electronic records
  • Indemnity costs
Read case analysis
Torts [2025] HKDC 1105

TSE CHI WAI v. CHAN KWAN HO AND OTHERS

District Court personal injuries action arising from a workplace assault. The court found the plaintiff and the assailant were employed by the 2nd defendant and held it vicariously liable.

  • Vicarious liability
  • Employment relationship
  • Contributory negligence
  • Quantum of damages
  • Employees' compensation ordinance
  • Admissibility of convictions
Read case analysis
Contract [2025] HKDC 154

SINO DATABASE LTD AND ANOTHER v. ABERDEEN BOAT CLUB LTD

The District Court dismissed a 2nd plaintiff’s late applications for expert evidence, specific discovery and vacating trial dates, but allowed a minor amendment and a supplemental witness statement.

  • Breach of contract
  • Negligence
  • Expert evidence admissibility
  • Specific discovery
  • Case management
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKDC 43

URBAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD 對 CHAN YAM WAN TOMMY 及另一人

Given that effective relief had been obtained against the 2nd defendant, the plaintiff unreasonably pursued summary relief against the 1st defendant which was discretionary and factually contestable (whether the 1st defendant was a joint tortfeasor); therefore it was unjust to shift costs to the 1st defendant. The summons is allowed to be withdrawn and no order as to costs is made; each party bears their own costs for the summons.

  • Injunctions
  • Trespass
  • Breach of deed of mutual covenant
  • Costs
  • Summary judgment
Read case analysis
Torts [2024] HKCFI 3580

TAM LI KAM WAH AGNES v. WONG PUI HANG WILLIAM AND ANOTHER

The court assessed damages in a fatal accident claim, finding the deceased’s parents were dependants and awarding losses for dependency, wealth accumulation and funeral expenses, subject to 15% contributory negligence.

  • Dependency
  • Loss of accumulation of wealth
  • Bereavement damages
  • Contributory negligence
  • Loss of chance
  • Pleading amendments and case management
Read case analysis
Torts [2024] HKDC 1113

LIU YUEFEN 對 CHAN WING MAN

Defendant was negligent in re-starting and driving without ensuring safety and failing to warn; defendant cannot collaterally attack the prior criminal conviction in these proceedings absent new evidence or exceptional unfairness given she had full opportunity at criminal trial; plaintiff was contributorily negligent and liability apportioned 50:50; damages of HK$227,371.25 awarded to plaintiff with specified interest and costs orders.

  • Negligence
  • Contributory negligence
  • Collateral attack of criminal conviction
  • Evidence ordinance s61(1)-(2)
  • Assessment of damages
Read case analysis
Torts [2024] HKDC 985

柯開榮 對 明泰建築工程有限公司

The court found the employer owed no breach because the task was simple and adequate training/guidance was provided; the co-worker was not negligent because plaintiff's sudden, close and startling approach caused the co-worker to involuntarily release the timber; plaintiff's own unreasonable conduct was the sole cause of the accident and injury, therefore claim dismissed and defendant not liable.

  • Employer's duty of care
  • Vicarious liability
  • Contributory negligence
  • Causation
  • Damages
  • Credibility assessment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.