12 Jan 2018
PRIMECREDIT LTD V. HON WAI KAN
- Citation
- [2018] HKDC 49
- Court
- District Court
- Case number
- DCCJ2251/2011
Court declined to admit the fresh evidence (Evidence Summons) because Ladd v Marshall tests were not satisfied and awarded costs of that summons to the plaintiff; the extension of time for the appeal would have been granted but Hon must pay costs of the Time Summons; the DCMP appeal was not unmeritorious and, subject to extension of time, its costs should be borne by the plaintiff; the First and Second Joinder Summonses were unnecessary duplication and their costs are awarded to the plaintiff; all costs to be taxed if not agreed; certificate for counsel awarded for the specified costs orders.
- Joinder of parties
- Charging order and sale of land
- Writ of possession and enforcement
- Adducing fresh evidence (ladd v marshall)
- Costs and taxation
- Extension of time for appeal