č˘ ĺ° č¨ą
Applicant failed to prove a substantial and bona fide reduction in means sufficient to justify varying the existing maintenance orders: his claimed increased rental outlay was overstated, he had significant MPF withdrawals available, and his overall capacity to pay remained such that the existing orders were sustainable; accordingly both variation applications were dismissed and the existing maintenance orders were maintained.
Source excerpt
- Spousal maintenance variation
- Child maintenance variation
- Change of circumstances
- Burden of proof
- Capacity to pay