17 Jul 2014
HORACE YAO YEE CHEONG AND ANOTHER v. KEVIN MARK BRADSHAW
- Citation
- HORACE YAO YEE CHEONG AND ANOTHER v. KEVIN MARK BRADSHAW
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCA2136/2009
The Tomlin order was set aside because the compromise did not resolve the Money Lenders Ordinance issues and there were strong arguable grounds that the underlying agreements might contravene ss24 or 25 MLO; the court must therefore permit those statutory issues to be litigated rather than enforce the compromise without scrutiny.
- Tomlin order
- Set aside
- Money lenders ordinance s24 and s25
- Usury/extortionate interest
- Compromise enforcement
- Order 27/order 42 enforcement