Hong Kong Case Law

香港特別行政區 訴 王增源

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA5/2025

The appellate court, on re-trial of the evidence, found the prosecution did not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had the requisite subjective intent to cause fear when he sent the short, partly hypothetical voice message; given the recent quarrel, volume of calls and potential emotional agitation, the statement could have been an impulsive outburst rather than a deliberate threat, so conviction was unsafe.

Source excerpt

• Criminal intimidation
• Mens rea
• Evidence evaluation
• Retrial standard
• Drunkenness and credibility

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 陳見思

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA243/2021

On a full rehearing the court accepted the trial judge's credibility findings that PW1 and PW2 were honest and that the appellant's account was not credible; the unsigned caution statement and on‑scene admissions were excluded or given no weight; the proposed fresh evidence did not satisfy the established criteria. The evidence proved the two counts of common assault beyond reasonable doubt and the appeal against conviction is dismissed.

Source excerpt

• Common assault
• Criminal intimidation
• Admissibility of confession
• Fresh evidence
• Credibility assessment
• Standard of proof on appeal

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 朱栢朗

Court

Court of Appeal

Case number

CACC252/2024

The trial judge provided adequate reasons and engaged with the principal criticisms of the complainant's evidence; his credibility findings were open on the evidence and the applicant's grounds did not show an arguable case that the conviction was unsafe, therefore leave to appeal against conviction is refused.

Source excerpt

• Assault causing bodily harm
• False imprisonment
• Blackmail
• Criminal intimidation
• Witness credibility
• Judgment reasons

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 鍾偉庭

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA450/2024

On a full re‑hearing the judge was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant possessed the requisite intent to cause fear; the single hypothetical threatening sentence, considered with the surrounding facts (high emotion, lack of assaultive movement despite holding a golf club, ongoing contractual relationship), left reasonable doubt as to mens rea and therefore the conviction could not stand.

Source excerpt

• Criminal intimidation
• Mens rea
• Standard of review on appeal (re‑hearing)
• Evaluation of witness credibility

Read case analysis

HKSAR v. L.F.

Court

Court of Appeal

Case number

CACC212/2024

Leave to appeal was granted in a criminal case involving indecent assault and criminal intimidation, after concerns about corroboration, identification, and sentencing arose.

• Indecent assault
• Criminal intimidation
• Credibility and identification
• Corroboration/complaint evidence
• Sentence calculation
• Indecent-assault

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 阮錫強

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA226/2023

The court accepted PW1's credibility, found the long usage of the WhatsApp number and the parties' relationship linked the number to the appellant, accepted PW1's interpretation that "collecting photos" meant her naked photos given prior display and refusal to delete, and found objectively and subjectively the message threatened reputational harm and was intended to frighten; evidence proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt, so the conviction stands.

Source excerpt

• Criminal intimidation
• Threats to reputation
• Privacy invasion (unauthorised photography)
• Domestic/relationship violence

Read case analysis

HKSAR v. ABDIKARIM, MOHAMED KHALIF

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA126/2024

The High Court allowed a sentence appeal in part, crediting additional custody periods and varying a five-month sentence to time served, with immediate release ordered.

• Criminal intimidation
• Possession of offensive weapon
• Administrative detention credit
• Totality principle
• Assessment of mitigation
• Time served

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 區國威

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA339/2024

The trial judge's acceptance of PW1's testimony was justified after detailed consideration; the prosecution proved that appellant claimed triad membership and uttered multiple threats; convictions under Societies Ordinance s20(2) and Crimes Ordinance ss24(a)(i),24(b)(i),27 are safe and the appeal is dismissed.

Source excerpt

• Criminal intimidation
• Triad membership offence
• Witness credibility
• Rehearing standard

Read case analysis

香港特別行政區 訴 陳定邦

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA331/2023

Having reviewed the CCTV and all contextual evidence on re-hearing, the judge concluded the appellant's words were a spontaneous outburst made in extreme anger ('wild and whirling words') without intent to intimidate and, given the circumstances (distance maintained, presence of colleagues, PW1's calmness), the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the words were intended to or would overcome the ordinary free will of a firm man; therefore conviction was unsafe and was quashed.

Source excerpt

• Criminal intimidation
• Mens rea
• 'wild and whirling words' doctrine
• Standard of proof on appeal
• Cctv and contemporaneous evidence

Read case analysis

HKSAR v. YIP SIN WAH

Court

Court of First Instance

Case number

HCMA253/2022

Appeal dismissed in a magistracy appeal against a criminal intimidation conviction, with the court upholding voice identification and circumstantial WhatsApp evidence.

• Criminal intimidation
• Voice identification
• Hearsay admissibility
• Circumstantial evidence
• Standard of review on rehearing
• Turnbull-style caution

Read case analysis