Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Permission was refused because the applicant failed to identify a reviewable decision, relied on incoherent and speculative allegations without objective evidence, sought remedies outside the scope of judicial review, and therefore had no real prospect of success such that the application constituted an abuse of process.
Source excerpt
The court joined Jean-Marc Peretti as a defendant, refused defendants’ interpleader relief, ordered further disclosure, delivery up to an independent custodian, and payment of proceeds into court.
The court dismissed a third-party application to discharge undertakings and refused a further delay in disclosure, extending compliance to 17 April 2026.
Dismissed application for leave to appeal from Small Claims Tribunal case-management orders, with the court finding no arguable bias or error of law.
The appellate court repeatedly viewed P1, accepted the magistrate's finding that at the moment the appellant cut into the second lane his vehicle was within less than one car length of the motorcycle causing the motorcycle to swerve and slow, found the appellant's alternative explanations and distance calculations unreliable or speculative, held that defensive motives do not excuse failing to keep a safe distance, and concluded prosecution proved careless driving beyond reasonable doubt so the conviction and sentence must be upheld.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal, extension of time, and stay applications in a family trust dispute, while upholding summary judgment on disclosure against the trustees.
The court found the interrogatories sought were sufficiently relevant to the core issue of employment status and necessary to enable proper preparation and to save costs; it therefore ordered the specified interrogatories to be served and answered by sworn affidavit within the prescribed periods and rejected the unsigned statement as inadmissible evidence.
Source excerpt
The court partly granted a summons for handwriting expert material, allowing additional original signature samples and ID documents, but refused a wider request as disproportionate.
The permission to appeal was refused because the plaintiff failed to adduce evidence to prove the value of the claimed loss, did not make a proper disclosure application and did not demonstrate that CCTV would produce decisive evidence; the 14 August 2025 Order 58 summons was incorrectly brought and revoked; the plaintiff failed to show a reasonable prospect of success under s63A(2), and the adjournment was refused.
Source excerpt
The court refused to exercise its discretion to extend time and refused leave to appeal because the application was 14 days late without explanation and the proposed appeal lacked a reasonable prospect of success and no other factor in the interests of justice justified hearing it; costs were ordered against the applicant.
Source excerpt
Explore more
