é„ ĺ°Ť 陳
The court accepted the jointly‑instructed Chinese lawyer's factual and legal investigation showing no evidence of registered ownership by the husband and that the local authorities/village committee could not confirm title; the applicant failed to prove the husband owned the Huizhou property or that any matrimonial asset existed. Therefore there were no assets to divide and the ancillary relief claim failed.
Source excerpt
- Ancillary relief
- Asset ownership
- Evidence and burden of proof
- Expert report