Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law HKSAR v. McCALL HOWARD KENNETH AND ANOTHER

HKSAR v. McCALL HOWARD KENNETH AND ANOTHER

The court excluded a psychiatrist’s proposed opinion evidence on drug consumption rates, holding the report lacked demonstrated expertise, methodology, and relevance to Hong Kong.

  • Expert evidence admissibility
  • Opinion evidence
  • Reliability of scientific evidence
  • Relevance and applicability of foreign studies
  • Gatekeeping function of trial judge
  • Use of consumption rates to infer trafficking
Read case analysis
Evidence LEUNG PIK WA v. POH PO LIAN AND ANOTHER

LEUNG PIK WA v. POH PO LIAN AND ANOTHER

The court allowed only limited factual parts of a witness statement and excluded the rest as inadmissible lay opinion evidence under s 58(2) of the Evidence Ordinance.

  • Opinion evidence
  • Expert evidence
  • Lay witness evidence
  • Admissibility
  • Evidence ordinance s58(2)
  • Opinion-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. TAI HIN WING

HKSAR v. TAI HIN WING

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction and sentence for corrupt conduct in voting, holding the polling officers gave lay evidence only and the 3-month sentence was not excessive.

  • Vote planting
  • Electoral fraud
  • Identification evidence
  • Opinion evidence
  • Sentencing
  • Electoral-fraud
Read case analysis
Personal injury HO SUK MAN v. SIT TIM MAU

HO SUK MAN v. SIT TIM MAU

The court granted retrospective leave to serve a late witness statement only in part, redacting unsupported and opinion-based material and permitting responsive steps by the defendant.

  • Assessment of damages
  • Admissibility of witness statements
  • Late service of evidence
  • Hearsay
  • Opinion evidence
  • Personal-injuries
Read case analysis
Defamation CHUI PUI KUN v. CHUI WAI KWAN

CHUI PUI KUN v. CHUI WAI KWAN

The court allowed further witness statements in a defamation case, but struck out opinion sentences saying the letters were not defamatory. Costs were awarded largely to the defendant.

  • Witness statements
  • Leave to serve
  • Opinion evidence
  • Qualified privilege
  • Costs assessment
  • Defamation
Read case analysis
Employment GEORGE CROFTS v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD AND ANOTHER

GEORGE CROFTS v. CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LTD AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance struck out parts of a pilot’s witness statements in consolidated employment actions, holding the material irrelevant, opinion-based, hearsay, or expert evidence.

  • Wrongful dismissal
  • Trade union activity
  • Strike out of witness evidence
  • Hearsay
  • Opinion evidence
  • Expert evidence
Read case analysis
Evidence KRALIK JAMES CHRISTOPHER v. VTECH HOLDINGS LTD

KRALIK JAMES CHRISTOPHER v. VTECH HOLDINGS LTD

The Court of First Instance allowed an application to adduce witness statements, holding that the challenged material was previously raised, and that some opinion evidence was admissible under s 58(2).

  • Witness statements
  • Admissibility
  • Opinion evidence
  • Particulars
  • Evidence ordinance s58(2)
  • Witness-statements
Read case analysis
Criminal law THE QUEEN v. LAU WAI MING (D1)

THE QUEEN v. LAU WAI MING (D1)

Appeal against conviction for acting as a member of a triad society. The court upheld the magistrate’s handling of identification, hearsay, and opinion evidence.

  • Triad society offence under societies ordinance s20(2)
  • Hearsay
  • Opinion evidence
  • Identification
  • Opinion-evidence
  • Identification-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law TANGKAO SAE TANG v. R.

TANGKAO SAE TANG v. R.

The Court of Appeal allowed a rape conviction appeal after finding the trial judge misdirected the jury on forensic opinion evidence; the good character direction caused no prejudice.

  • Rape
  • Opinion evidence
  • Good character
  • Jury direction
  • Misdirection
  • Forensic evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal law THE QUEEN v. LEUNG YU LING

THE QUEEN v. LEUNG YU LING

The appeal was allowed because the magistrates’ record was too unclear to show the basis of the evidence, including hearsay and opinion evidence. The conviction was set aside and a retrial ordered.

  • Theft
  • Admissibility of hearsay
  • Opinion evidence
  • Recording of trial proceedings
  • Retrial
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.