10 Aug 2022
羅小玲及另二人 對 鄭慧玲及另一人
- Citation
- [2022] HKLdT 34
- Court
- Lands Tribunal
- Case number
- LDBM26/2020
The 702 notice and the 716 meeting were not a lawful response to the 501 requisition because (a) the notice's agenda materially differed from the matters specified in the requisition, (b) the chairman had not obtained management committee authorization to convene the meeting under Sch 3(1)(1) nor did the facts justify reliance on Sch 2(6A)(1), and (c) a chairman lacks unilateral authority to substitute or alter requisitioned items; accordingly the notice, meeting and all resolutions are invalid and the Tribunal should exercise its discretion to declare them so.
- Validity of meeting notice
- Owners' requisition under bmo sch 3(1)(2)
- Authority of chairman vs management committee
- Remedy by declaration
- Meeting procedure and voting