王艷 對 陳穎懷及另一人
The Court refused out‑of‑time permission because the applicant did not offer any explanation for the two‑month delay, the asserted grounds of appeal were misconceived or had no realistic prospect of success (including fundamental misunderstandings of recusal procedure and procedural rules on pleading and expert evidence), and the procedural delay in a judgment being issued beyond three months did not amount to illegality. Consequently the extension of time was not justified and the application was dismissed with costs.
Source excerpt
- Leave to appeal out of time
- Extension of time
- Recusal of judge
- Costs
- Procedural compliance