25 Mar 2003
MAN PING NAM v. MAN MEI KWAI
- Citation
- MAN PING NAM v. MAN MEI KWAI
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV193/2002
Majority held leave must be refused: the appeal did not qualify as of right under s22(1)(a) because the question raised had no monetary value and the value of the underlying land could not convert it into a monetary dispute; further, no lis existed on the facts so the case was not appropriate for leave under s22(1)(b).
- Leave to appeal
- Section 22(1)(a) and 22(1)(b) - right of appeal and public importance
- Section 15 new territories ordinance - consent for letting
- Value threshold for appeal
- Declaratory relief
- Lis requirement