Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2026] HKDC 507

H.K.F.S. FUND LTD v. 羅芷澄 AND OTHERS

The District Court allowed an appeal against a Master’s costs decision, holding the plaintiff was the effective winner after settlement and that no order as to costs should be made.

  • Costs on discontinuance
  • Effective winner doctrine
  • Indemnity costs
  • Joinder
  • Mareva injunction
  • Settlement
Read case analysis
Property law [2026] HKDC 139

LAI PIT YOK PIUS also known as LAI PIK YOK v. LAI YAN

The District Court held that the plaintiff was the effective winner after settlement granted vacant possession, so the defendant had to pay the costs of the action and the costs contest.

  • Vacant possession
  • Constructive trust
  • Resulting trust
  • Proprietary estoppel
  • Mesne profits
  • Costs follow the event
Read case analysis
Contract [2025] HKDC 1944

LAI YAU FOON v. WONG TIN CHEUNG AND OTHERS

賣方未交付空置管有,法院裁定其違反協議;“完全放棄”抗辯不成立,並就損失以合約價與後續和解金差額計算賠償。

  • Breach of contract
  • Vacant possession
  • Third party claims
  • Adverse possession
  • Waiver
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKCFI 2634

HANG HEUNG CAKE SHOP COMPANY LTD v. TSOI CHIK SANG LAWRENCE AND ANOTHER

High Court costs decision on a disputed sanctioned offer: the court held the 5 May 2025 letter was a valid acceptance, upheld settlement, and awarded indemnity costs.

  • Order 22 sanctioned offer and acceptance
  • Notice of acceptance and filing requirements (order 22)
  • Consolidation of actions
  • Indemnity costs for abuse of process
  • Misrepresentation and undue influence by third parties
  • Company authority to litigate
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKDC 481

曹連英 對 禤氏律師行

The application for leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's grounds lacked a reasonable prospect of success: the alleged non‑service and procedural unfairness were not supported by the record, the allegations of solicitor misconduct were unsupported by evidence considered in the earlier judgment, and the settlement occurred with the applicant's consent; accordingly there was no justification to grant an oral hearing under s63A.

  • Leave to appeal
  • Striking out
  • Solicitor misconduct
  • Settlement
  • Costs nisi order
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKDC 459

RAO SUPING v. TRIBEST HOLDINGS LTD

The court dismissed a unilateral summons seeking settlement and costs orders, holding there was no evidential basis to direct the absent defendant to pay.

  • Costs orders
  • Settlement
  • Absent defendant
  • Affidavit evidence
  • Judicial discretion
  • Costs-orders
Read case analysis
Civil litigation [2024] HKDC 1157

LAW CHUNG TAI v. SUN PROFIT LOGISTICS (HK) LTD AND ANOTHER

The court held the plaintiff’s letter was not a valid sanctioned offer, declined indemnity costs, and ordered party-and-party costs with specific apportionment for two summonses.

  • Sanctioned offer
  • Calderbank offer
  • Indemnity costs
  • Party and party costs
  • Order 22 rdc
  • Order 62 rdc
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.