Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Defamation [2026] HKDC 730

郭志文 對 機電工程署

The writ and particulars failed to plead the fundamental elements of a defamation claim (no specific defamatory words, no pleaded publication to third parties); the complained-of documents were internal disciplinary communications attractive of qualified privilege which claimant did not rebut with evidence of malice; the claim was therefore frivolous/vexatious and an abuse of process and must be struck out.

  • Strike out
  • Qualified privilege
  • Pleading standards
  • Publication
  • Abuse of process
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Tort [2026] HKCFI 2052

CHAN TUN HAU v. SZE YAN YAN AILEEN AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance dismissed an appeal against strike-out of a negligent misrepresentation claim, holding no duty of care was properly pleaded and no loss was shown.

  • Negligent misrepresentation
  • Strike out
  • Duty of care
  • Frivolous and vexatious proceedings
  • Appeal
  • Negligent-misrepresentation
Read case analysis
Trusts [2026] HKCFI 2190

PAMELA ALDRED AND OTHERS v. CASTLE FIDUCIARY LTD AND ANOTHER

The Court of First Instance dismissed a trustee’s summons to reopen a standing issue or seek an out-of-time appeal, and ordered indemnity costs.

  • Locus standi (standing)
  • Authority to sue
  • Strike out
  • Case management
  • Leave to appeal out of time
  • Indemnity costs
Read case analysis
Equity [2026] HKCFI 1932

ZHANG YUYAN v. TO NGAN HO

Summary judgment was refused in a property and trust dispute between family members over two Le Pont properties, with the defendant’s indemnity claims left for trial.

  • Resulting trust
  • Constructive trust
  • Trustee indemnity
  • Equitable lien
  • Summary judgment
  • Strike out
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKCFI 6277

梁志文 對 香港特別行政區政府

The claim was struck out because it sought to relitigate and challenge criminal convictions that have not been set aside, thereby constituting an abuse of process and disclosing no reasonable cause of action; a civil litigation restriction order was proportionate to prevent further repetition of such abuse.

  • Strike out
  • Abuse of process
  • Res judicata
  • Civil litigation restriction order
  • Malicious prosecution claim
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] HKCFI 6297

鍾玲 對 長江和記實業有限公司

The statement of claim was struck out and the action dismissed because the pleading disclosed no reasonable cause of action, contained only unparticularised and serious allegations without factual foundation, was time-barred on its face, involved non-justiciable national/foreign-state matters, and amounted to frivolous, vexatious and abusive litigation not curable by amendment.

  • Strike out
  • Disclosure of cause of action
  • Time-bar (limitation)
  • Vexatious litigation
  • Non-justiciability / national security
Read case analysis
Defamation [2025] HKCFI 5070

鍾玲 對 星島日報出版有限公司

The amended statement of claim failed to disclose any reasonable cause of action because it lacked necessary factual particulars linking the 2016 publication to any legally cognisable personal injury or loss, the claim was time‑barred under the Limitation Ordinance, and the pleadings were malicious/frivolous and an abuse of process; accordingly the claim must be struck out and the appeal dismissed, with costs awarded to the defendant.

  • Strike out
  • Abuse of process
  • Limitation
  • Costs
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.