3 Jul 2018
HKSAR v. KALEEM, MUHAMMAD
- Citation
- [2018] HKCFI 1526
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA200/2018
The appellate judge accepted the magistrate's primary fact findings and credibility assessments, found the defence account was contrived and incredible, concluded the only and irresistible inference from the evidence was that the appellant was employed and working in breach of section 38AA, and held the conviction was not unsafe thus dismissing the appeal.
- Taking employment while remaining in hong kong unlawfully
- Section 38aa immigration ordinance
- Rehearing under section 113 magistrates ordinance
- Credibility and irresistible inference