30 Aug 2013
香港特別行政區 訴 顧精傑
- Citation
- 香港特別行政區 訴 顧精傑
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCMA51/2011
The trial adjudicator's acceptance of the complainants' consistent documentary and oral evidence together with expert evidence of an implausible high-frequency trading pattern provided a rational basis to infer the appellant acted without authority to obtain commission; there was no basis for the appellate court to disturb credibility findings or grant further adjournment, so the conviction stands.
- Attempted fraud
- Credibility of witnesses
- Expert evidence on trading patterns
- Adjournment and legal aid
- Authorization for trading