Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2018] HKCA 13

HKSAR v. YUEN CHEUNG MING, LEON

The Court of Appeal allowed a criminal appeal, quashed the trafficking conviction, and ordered a retrial because the trial judge inadequately summed up the defence case.

  • Possession
  • Trafficking
  • Jury directions
  • Summing up adequacy
  • Circumstantial evidence
  • Application of proviso
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. GONZALEZ MARTINEZ JEFFERSON JOSE

HKSAR v. GONZALEZ MARTINEZ JEFFERSON JOSE

The Court of Appeal dismissed a burglary appeal, holding that despite a factual error at trial, the undisputed evidence still led to the only reasonable inference of guilt.

  • Burglary
  • Evidence and inferences from presence of items
  • Reopening trial decisions (functus officio/perfection rule)
  • Application of proviso
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Evidence-inference
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. MAK CHAI KWONG AND ANOTHER

HKSAR v. MAK CHAI KWONG AND ANOTHER

终审法院裁定,上诉人未被证明在购入物业时已成立交叉持有信托;法院不应以推论上的交叉持有来维持定罪,故上诉得直,定罪撤销。

  • Conspiracy to defraud
  • Private tenancy allowance (pta)
  • Cross-leasing vs cross-holding
  • Resulting trust
  • Application of proviso
  • Inferential proof beyond reasonable doubt
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. YEUNG WAI HO HENRY

HKSAR v. YEUNG WAI HO HENRY

Court of Appeal held the trial judge misapplied the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance presumption and wrongly used silence against the accused, so the conviction was quashed and a retrial ordered.

  • Presumption of possession (s47 dangerous drugs ordinance)
  • Evidential burden
  • Right to silence
  • Application of proviso
  • Retrial
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. CHENG KONG SANG

HKSAR v. CHENG KONG SANG

Court of Appeal set aside a trafficking conviction, finding the trial judge relied on an erroneous factual assumption; the conviction was substituted with simple possession.

  • Trafficking v possession
  • Evidentiary burden
  • Application of proviso
  • Conviction substitution
  • Drug-trafficking
  • Drug-possession
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. LEI KAM HUNG

HKSAR v. LEI KAM HUNG

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, quashed a conviction for indecent assault, and ordered a retrial after finding the verdict unsafe.

  • Admissibility of unsworn evidence
  • Witness retraction and safety of conviction
  • Voluntariness of confession
  • Jury discharge and prejudice
  • Voir dire
  • Application of proviso
Read case analysis
Criminal law HKSAR v. YIP SAI MING

HKSAR v. YIP SAI MING

Court of Appeal held that the applicant’s omission to report relevant changes under the HFA scheme could support deception. Convictions 1–10 were quashed, 11–19 upheld.

  • Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception
  • Omission as deception
  • Civil service regulations and reporting obligations
  • Application of proviso
  • Obtaining-pecuniary-advantage-by-deception
  • Omission-as-deception
Read case analysis
Criminal law LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

The Court of Final Appeal allowed two criminal appeals, quashed trafficking convictions and ordered retrials after errors in cross-examination, defence evidence directions and cut-throat defence directions.

  • Cross-examination of antecedent statements
  • Approach to defence evidence
  • Cut-throat defence directions
  • Jury directions
  • Application of proviso
  • Possession and trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

LAW CHUNG KI AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

Appeals were allowed after errors in cross-examination, defence-evidence directions, and the absence of a proper cut-throat defence direction made the convictions unsafe.

  • Cross-examination on antecedent statements
  • Directions on defence evidence and reasonable doubt
  • Cut-throat defence directions
  • Application of proviso
  • Cross-examination
  • Jury-directions
Read case analysis
Criminal law CHOW WAI CHOI AND OTHERS v. HKSAR

CHOW WAI CHOI AND OTHERS v. HKSAR

The Court of Final Appeal refused leave to appeal in a criminal conspiracy-to-defraud case, holding the issues were fact-specific and no substantial injustice was shown.

  • Conspiracy to defraud
  • Summing-up obligations to jury
  • Application of proviso
  • Substantial and grave injustice
  • Trial irregularity
  • Judicial guidance to counsel
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.