張莉 對 KO KA YUE
Leave to appeal was granted in part because the applicant demonstrated arguable errors of law or principle in the Tribunal's handling of specific items (items 5,6,8,12) regarding whether the tenant could discharge repair obligations by the least onerous method and in the assessment of repair duration and rent loss (items 14 and 15) including responsibility for rent during key transit; all other factual findings were not shown to be plainly wrong and leave was refused for those items; costs to follow the appeal outcome.
Source excerpt
- Deposit forfeiture
- Repair and dilapidations
- Mitigation of loss
- Leave to appeal
- Rent arrears