何貝芳 對 袁國強及另一人
The court found the plaintiff's allegations lacked contemporaneous supporting evidence, her credibility was weak, and the documentary and communication evidence showed she participated in drafting and accepted the terms; therefore she failed to prove duress, undue influence or unconscionability and the memorandum, property transfers and share transfer are valid and enforceable; the bank was an innocent bona fide mortgagee without notice of any overriding equitable interest.
Source excerpt
- Duress
- Undue influence
- Unconscionable bargain
- Rescission of transfers
- Mortgagee bona fide for value without notice
- Credibility and evidence