12 Jul 2021
劉佛照 對 房屋署
- Citation
- [2021] HKCFI 1941
- Court
- Court of First Instance
- Case number
- HCAL837/2020
The court refused extension of time and refused leave because the applicant's delay was substantial and unjustified and his claimed grounds lacked an arguable case: the alleged misrepresentations were matters of fact for the Housing Department and Appeal Board (not amenable to review on merits), the forms were sufficiently clear, there was no evidence of staff misleading or procedural unfairness at the appeal, and the appeal board had considered health issues; accordingly no basis for judicial intervention.
- Termination of public housing tenancy
- False declaration/misrepresentation
- Limitation/extension of time
- Procedural fairness
- Judicial review leave