16 Jul 2018
RE SOHAIL MUHAMMAD ANJUM
- Citation
- [2018] HKCA 385
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- CACV57/2018
The Court held that the judge correctly refused leave because the applicant presented no reasonably arguable legal ground: there was no evidence linking the interpreter to LT or explaining refusal to speak; the medical evidence did not demonstrate incapacity to participate and the later private doctor’s note could not be admitted on appeal under Ladd v Marshall; no error of law or procedural unfairness nor Wednesbury unreasonableness was shown by the Board’s decision; therefore leave to apply for judicial review was rightly refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Judicial review leave
- Procedural fairness
- Interpreter bias
- Adjournment for medical reasons
- Fresh evidence admissibility (ladd v marshall)
- Wednesbury unreasonableness