Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional law [2026] HKCFI 2530

PHAM KHANH LY v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave to seek judicial review was dismissed in a non-refoulement case. The court found no arguable error of law, procedural unfairness, or irrationality in the Board’s decision.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Procedural fairness
  • Wednesbury unreasonableness
  • Right to life (article 2 hkboro)
  • Credibility findings
  • Judicial review leave test
Read case analysis
Immigration [2026] HKCFI 2083

PHAM DOAN TIEP v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The Court of First Instance dismissed an application for leave to seek judicial review of a non-refoulement decision, finding no arguable public law error.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk (part viic immigration ordinance)
  • Credibility and findings of fact
  • Judicial review leave test
  • Internal relocation
  • Judicial-review-leave
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2026] HKCFI 2084

NGUYEN THANH HAI v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The Court of First Instance dismissed leave for judicial review of a non-refoulement decision, finding no arguable error of law, unfairness, or irrationality.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk
  • Hkbor art 2 (right to life)
  • Hkbor art 3 (torture/cruel treatment)
  • Unified screening mechanism (usm)
  • Judicial review leave test
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2026] HKCFI 1959

SK MOINUDDIN v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave for judicial review was refused because the applicant failed to identify any reasonably arguable public law ground against the non-refoulement decision.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk
  • Right to life (article 2 bor)
  • Prohibition of cruel and inhuman treatment (article 3 bor)
  • Persecution (refugee convention article 33)
  • Judicial review leave test
Read case analysis
Immigration [2026] HKCFI 1961

KHAN AMMAD v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave for judicial review of a non-refoulement decision was dismissed because no reasonably arguable public law ground was identified.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk (part viic immigration ordinance)
  • Article 2 bor (right to life)
  • Article 3 bor (torture/cruel inhuman degrading treatment)
  • Persecution under refugee convention (article 33)
  • Judicial review leave test
Read case analysis
Constitutional and administrative law [2026] HKCFI 1390

AJAY KUMAR v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave to seek judicial review was dismissed because no arguable illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety was shown in the Board's credibility-based decision.

  • Credibility findings
  • Judicial review leave test
  • Procedural impropriety
  • Standard of review
  • Non‑refoulement
  • Judicial-review
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2026] HKCFI 900

PURI MANINDER SINGH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave to apply for judicial review was refused in a non-refoulement case because the applicant raised no arguable legal ground and the Board’s factual findings disclosed no reviewable error.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk
  • Hkbor articles 2 and 3
  • Unified screening mechanism
  • Judicial review leave test
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Constitutional law [2026] HKCFI 824

BHARDWAJ RAMANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave for judicial review was refused in a non-refoulement case involving a mother and her minor son. The Court found no realistic prospect of success.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture
  • Article 2 right to life (hkbor)
  • Article 3 cidtp (hkbor)
  • Internal relocation
  • Child-specific procedural fairness
Read case analysis
Administrative law [2026] HKCFI 667

ROHANI AHMAD v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

Leave to seek judicial review was refused because the applicant did not show any arguable public law error in the Board’s non-refoulement decision.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture risk
  • Unified screening mechanism
  • Judicial review leave test
  • Credibility findings
  • Hkbor articles 2 and 3
Read case analysis
Immigration law [2025] HKCFI 6184

TRI MULIA ASIH v. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE [Decision on Leave Application]

The High Court refused leave for judicial review of a non-refoulement decision, finding no reasonably arguable ground, no procedural unfairness, and no reviewable legal error.

  • Non-refoulement
  • Torture and article 3 bora
  • Persecution and 1951 refugee convention art 33
  • Judicial review leave test
  • Wednesbury unreasonableness
  • State protection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.