Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Judicial review standard (edward v bairstow)
  • 2 May 1997

    MING PAO NEWSPAPERS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER FOR TELEVISION AND ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY

    Citation
    MING PAO NEWSPAPERS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER FOR TELEVISION AND ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY
    Court
    Court of First Instance
    Case number
    HCOA1/1997

    The tribunal erred in law by applying an "indispensability" test to require that a pictorial part be essential to the text to qualify as an honest purpose under s.10(1)(e); honest purpose may include use of a photograph to attract or inform readers but the degree, size and adequacy of obfuscation of offending nudity must be assessed for justification. The tribunal's determination is set aside and the matter is remitted for rehearing with directions accordingly.

    • Indecency
    • Control of obscene and indecent articles ordinance s.10 guidance
    • Honest purpose
    • Dominant effect
    • Obfuscation of nudity
    • Judicial review standard (edward v bairstow)