李官東 對 大埔759阿信屋店
The tribunal correctly applied the pricing evidence (store signage and receipt) to find no overcharge; the HK$50,000 damages claim lacked particulars and evidential foundation and was properly struck out summarily; the applicant produced no evidence to support allegations of adjudicator corruption; accordingly the application for leave to appeal lacked any real prospect of success and is refused.
Source excerpt
- Overpayment
- Damages
- Jurisdiction
- Leave to appeal
- Procedural fairness
- Allegations of corruption