Hong Kong Case Law: Decisions & Judgments | LexChat

Hong Kong Case Law

Limitation period and acknowledgements (lo s23)
  • 10 Oct 2017

    HARBOUR HERO ENTERPRISES LTD v. 周濃娣

    Citation
    HARBOUR HERO ENTERPRISES LTD v. 周濃娣
    Court
    District Court
    Case number
    DCCJ4969/2016

    Defendant failed to demonstrate a real prospect of successfully defending the action because the plaintiff produced cogent evidence (rental receipts, rent collection testimony and a reply letter acknowledging plaintiff's ownership) that the defendant was a tenant; the reply letter constituted an acknowledgement under LO s23(1); on the evidence the defendant's bare denials and uncorroborated assertions do not carry sufficient conviction, therefore the application to set aside the default judgment must be dismissed.

    • Adverse possession
    • Setting aside default judgment
    • Limitation period and acknowledgements (lo s23)
    • Tenancy vs licence
    • Extension of limitation by newborn members of a t'ong