Sign in
Hong Kong Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Hong Kong Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Hong Kong decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure VINSON ENGINEERING LTD v. KIN SHING ENGINEERING (HK) CO LTD AND ANOTHER

VINSON ENGINEERING LTD v. KIN SHING ENGINEERING (HK) CO LTD AND ANOTHER

The District Court refused leave to appeal against a striking-out order, holding the pleaded claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action and that the cited authorities were distinguishable.

  • Striking out for want of reasonable cause of action
  • Leave to appeal
  • Settlement and consideration
  • Certified taxed debt
  • Winding-up petition
  • Notification obligations
Read case analysis
Bankruptcy law RE CHAN WING HING

RE CHAN WING HING

Court of Appeal held s 30A(10)(b) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance is mandatory and applies to departures from Hong Kong without notice, but not to absences under one day.

  • Automatic discharge
  • Interpretation of s30a(10)(b)
  • Extension of bankruptcy period
  • Freedom to travel
  • Notification obligations
  • Bankruptcy-law
Read case analysis
Civil procedure THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF TUEN MUN HUNG CHEUNG INDUSTRIAL CENTRE (PHASE 1) v. UNITED HONG KONG LTD.

THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF TUEN MUN HUNG CHEUNG INDUSTRIAL CENTRE (PHASE 1) v. UNITED HONG KONG LTD.

The Court of Appeal in chambers extended time for the defendant to serve a notice of appeal after the sealed order was not promptly communicated.

  • Extension of time
  • Service of notice of appeal
  • Sealing of order
  • Notification obligations
  • Extension-of-time
  • Notice-of-appeal
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Contract law KARL WIDENMANN v. BANQUE DE L\' INDOCHINE

KARL WIDENMANN v. BANQUE DE L\' INDOCHINE

The court found the Swiss Credit Bank was defendant's sub‑agent and negligent in failing to advise non‑payment, but the plaintiff's signed application contained an exemption clause broad enough to absolve the defendant from liability for acts or omissions of its correspondent/sub‑agent including negligence; accordingly defendant was not liable and its counterclaim for the outstanding debt succeeded.

  • Breach of contract
  • Negligence
  • Vicarious/sub-agent liability
  • Exemption clause interpretation
  • Estoppel
  • Counterclaim for debt
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Hong Kong decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.