Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Hong Kong decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The court set aside the knowing receipt part of a default judgment, upheld liability for unlawful means conspiracy, and adjourned amendment issues with costs orders.
The court dismissed a solicitors’ negligence claim, holding that Madam Tam was not the firm’s client and that the pleaded wider duties were not owed.
The Court discharged most ex parte injunctions in a company-funds dispute, holding ss.728–730 did not support reflective-loss monetary relief and that there had been material non-disclosure.
The Court of First Instance dismissed a Mareva injunction application arising from the Ausca and Lohas transactions, finding insufficient arguable quantum and no solid evidence of dissipation.
The Court of First Instance refused to strike out an unfair prejudice petition, holding that lack of financial loss does not automatically defeat such a claim and that the issues need trial.
The Court dismissed an originating summons after finding no real risk of dissipation for Mareva relief and no proper basis for an ex parte approach, but awarded the defendants 80% costs.
The Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal against a Family Court decision declining to transfer ancillary relief proceedings, holding the challenge had no merit.
The District Court dismissed the plaintiff’s Order 14 summary judgment summons against the 2nd defendant, finding triable issues on the agreement, liability, and reflective loss.
The District Court dismissed an expungement summons, refused late evidence and a legal aid stay uplift, and set aside a default judgment only on terms after finding regular service.
The court discharged a Hong Kong Mareva injunction in aid of Australian family proceedings, citing public policy, no real dissipation risk, and material non-disclosure.
Explore more
