22 Mar 2024
上訴法庭確認原告人的申索陳述書未能披露合理訴因、部分訴因已逾時且整體訴訟構成對社署之瑣屑無理纏擾（濫用司法程序），原審法官剔除訴狀及撤銷訴訟的決定屬正確；有關惡意檢控未獲證明；上訴不得為未在原審提出之新訴因或引入不具重大影響之新證據，故駁回上訴並判付訟費。
4 Mar 2024
The amended statement of claim failed to disclose any reasonable cause under the Sex Discrimination Ordinance because the alleged conduct consisted of vulgar insults and workplace complaints devoid of a sexual element, and any references to claimant's wife or mother did not make the claimant the object of sexual advances or attraction; the victimisation allegation about withholding a firearm did not allege differential treatment grounded in sex. Accordingly the court granted the strike‑out application and dismissed the claimant's amended claim against the first respondent.
27 May 2019
The statement of claim did not disclose a reasonable cause of action: the allegations were vague, internally inconsistent and failed to plead essential facts for malicious prosecution or false imprisonment (eg no prosecution/conviction; detention shown to be lawful). Amendment would not cure the defects. Therefore the claim was properly struck out under O.18 r.19(1)(a) and all claims dismissed.