Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
India decisions
Source-linked decisions currently available to browse
The Supreme Court held that a waitlisted candidate already recommended under the old Uttar Pradesh Act could not seek a fresh posting under Section 13(4) after the new Act commenced.
Supreme Court held that the partition decree was executable on its terms and set aside the High Court’s order that had halted execution pending a fresh final decree.
Supreme Court quashed the MHA’s non-speaking refusal of premature release, holding that remission cannot be denied solely because the offence is heinous.
The Supreme Court apportioned fee liability for medical students transferred mid-course to private colleges, placing the main burden on the defaulting trust.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, found the prosecution case unreliable, set aside the conviction, and acquitted Talari Naresh.
The Supreme Court held that an appeal filed and refiled before NCLAT without the required certified copy was incompetent and should have been rejected at the threshold.
The Supreme Court held that billing discrepancies and delayed medical records did not disclose criminal offences, and quashed the complaint under Section 482 CrPC.
The Supreme Court allowed a challenge over mother-tongue education, directing Rajasthan to frame policy for Rajasthani as an educational language and school subject.
The Court held that the charges under ss.3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act and under Section 506 r/w Section 34 IPC were unsustainable because the FIR and chargesheet showed the alleged abuses and threats occurred within the four walls of a residential house without public gaze or independent public witnesses, and there was no sufficient averment of intent to cause alarm or of common intention; accordingly the FIR No.42 of 2021 and the charge-sheet were quashed and the impugned orders set aside.
Source excerpt
The High Court Division Bench erred by reappreciating evidence and disturbing concurrent findings of fact recorded by the disciplinary, appellate and revisional authorities which were founded on relevant material and, after independent forensic verification by Bihar Police, established that the two identities were the same person; the dismissal was the result of a fair and lawful enquiry and is restored; the Patna District appointment (Order No.10524 of 2007) and the appointment of "Santosh Kumar" as Constable in Bihar are quashed; competent police authorities are directed to examine and take…
Source excerpt
Explore more
