SARDAR SINGH versus SMT. KRISHNA DEVI AND ANR.
The award declared a pre-existing joint ownership and was not compulsorily registrable; the vendor’s sale agreement could be specifically enforced only to the extent of his half share.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sardar Singh; Respondent: Smt. Krishna Devi; Respondent: Kartar Lal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court decree set aside; trial court decree modified to specific performance for only half share of property.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Registration of Awards, Benami Transactions, Specific Performance, Part Performance of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sardar Singh
Appellant
Smt. Krishna Devi
Respondent
Kartar Lal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Delhi High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unregistered private arbitration award declaring a pre-existing right in immovable property is compulsorily registrable under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908
- 2 Whether the courts below were justified in decreeing specific performance for the entire property when the vendor held only half share
Ratio Decidendi
The award declared a pre-existing joint ownership and was not compulsorily registrable; the vendor’s sale agreement could be specifically enforced only to the extent of his half share.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court decree set aside; trial court decree modified to specific performance for only half share of property.
Orders
- Contract for sale enforceable only to the extent of half share held by vendor; first respondent entitled to specific performance for half share only.
- Parties to bear their own costs throughout.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment