JOSEPH KANTHARAJ & ANR. versus ATIHARUNNISA BEGUM S.
On the facts, since the appellant produced an agreement of sale and there was no evidence of rent payment or acknowledgement of tenancy after its execution, and there was a pending suit for specific performance, the eviction proceedings should be deferred until disposal of the suit. The trial court's order was justified, and the High Court erred in granting eviction relying solely on prior case law without addressing the specific factual defence raised by the appellant.
Source excerpt
- Eviction proceedings
- Part performance of contract
- Relationship of landlord and tenant
- Deferment of eviction
- Suit for specific performance