MADAN MOHAN SINGH versus VED PRAKASH ARYA
The respondent failed to prove tenancy (no rent receipts/accounts and reliance on surmise); the partnership deed executed by the parties and the Chief Administrator's binding finding under Clause 12 that the respondent was a servant established that the premises were not sublet; therefore the respondent was not a tenant and the appellant was entitled to possession and mandatory relief.
Source excerpt
- Tenancy
- Subletting
- Allotment conditions (clause 12)
- Possession
- Mandatory injunction
- Mesne profits