Esheria India Case Law
Sign in
India Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

India Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter India case law

Results update automatically as you type.

India decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Statutory interpretation

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. versus M/S PUNJAB SPINTEX LTD.

Market Fee levied under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and Rural Development Fee levied under the Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987 are distinct; the Industrial Policy, 2003 (Clause 11.4.2(i)) expressly exempts only Market fees and does not also exempt Rural Development fees, and therefore the respondent was not entitled to exemption from Rural Development Fee; appeals allowed and High Court orders set aside.

Source excerpt

  • Market fee exemption
  • Rural development fee exemption
  • Industrial policy 2003 interpretation
  • Scope of exemptions
  • Notified market area fees
Read case analysis
Agricultural law

SANGAM MILK PRODUCER COMPANY LTD. versus THE AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE & ORS.

'Ghee' is a product of livestock under the Act because it is a derivative of milk which is a product of livestock; the 1994 notification was validly issued under Section 4 and did not require the draft-notification/hearing procedure of Section 3; consequently Market Committees were empowered to levy market fees on ghee and appellants are liable to pay the accumulated fees subject to the Court's instalment order.

Source excerpt

  • Definition of 'products of livestock'
  • Validity of government notification under sections 3 and 4
  • Liability to pay market fee
  • Procedure for notification and publication
Read case analysis
Tenancy law

KESHAV BHAURAO YEOLE (D) BY LRS. versus MURALIDHAR (D) & ORS.

The landlord's own holding was found to be 13 acres of jirayat land, which does not exceed one unit of economic holding (16 acres); applying the amended notification under s.43A(3) and s.33B(5)(b) (not ss.31A/31B), the entitlement is to restore so much leased land as will result in landlord and tenants holding equal total areas for personal cultivation; the High Court's remand to re-examine bona fide requirement after the landlord's death was erroneous because the relevant date is the date of filing the eviction application; applying the formula in Devidas Narayan More v. Chunnilal Bhailal Wa…

Source excerpt

  • Termination of tenancy
  • Personal cultivation
  • Economic holding
  • Application of notifications under s.43a
  • Remand by court
Read case analysis
Land law

VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA versus STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

Sections 43 and 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 apply to testamentary dispositions; the term 'assignment' in the Act must be construed to include testamentary disposition to effectuate the legislative scheme of protecting cultivating tenants and preventing transfer to non-agriculturists absent prior sanction; the State enactment is within the competence of the State Legislature (pith and substance); the Division Bench of the High Court was correct and the appeals are dismissed (Mahadeo (2017) 13 SCC 756 held incorrect).

Source excerpt

  • Statutory purchase
  • Testamentary disposition
  • Restriction on transfer of agricultural land
  • Pith and substance doctrine
  • Tenancy rights
  • Ceiling on holdings
Read case analysis
Debt relief

SATPAL AND ANR. versus BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

The National Commission erred in reversing concurrent findings of the District Forum and State Commission. Explanation 2 requires classification by the largest holding in a pooled loan; the largest holding was 4 acres 6 kanals 11 marlas so appellants are 'small farmers' and therefore entitled to full waiver under Clause 5. The Annexure-I proviso to Clause 6 is relevant only to OTS under Clause 6 and does not apply to claims under Clause 5. Explanation 3 is inapplicable because the loan was for purchase of a tractor falling within investment credit for direct agricultural activities under Clau…

Source excerpt

  • Debt waiver under policy
  • Classification of farmers under scheme
  • Interpretation of scheme clauses and explanations
  • One time settlement (ots) provisions
  • Investment loan vs allied activities
Read case analysis
Land reform

MONTHI MENEZES (D) BY LR. versus DEVAKI AMMA (D) BY LR. & ANR.

The High Court erred in setting aside the Land Tribunal's order without properly considering the Tribunal's categorical findings of fact (possession as on 1.3.1974, necessity of the disputed land for cultivation of adjacent holdings, and references in the lease chit) and without applying the wide definition of 'land' in Section 2(18) of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961; consequently the matter is remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration on merits in accordance with law, with interim status quo on possession maintained.

Source excerpt

  • Occupancy rights
  • Tenancy
  • Punja land
  • Interpretation of 'land' under section 2(18)
Read case analysis
Tax law

C.I.T. BOMBAY versus TASGAON TALUKA S.S.K. LTD.

The difference between the Statutory Minimum Price fixed under Clause 3 and the additional price fixed under Clause 5A of the Sugar Cane (Control) Order, 1966 contains an element of profit, but not the entire difference constitutes profit sharing; only the actual profit component distributed should be treated as appropriation of profit and disallowed as expenditure, the remainder being allowable. The matter is remitted to the assessing officers to undertake this factual determination.

Source excerpt

  • Deductibility of expenditure
  • Interpretation of price control orders
  • Sharing of profits by co-operative societies
Read case analysis
Election law

SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. AND ORS. versus DETHALI GOPALAK VIVIDH KARYAKARI

Members of managing committees of co-operative societies facing liquidation under Section 107 of the Societies Act retain statutory rights to participate in the election process of Agricultural Produce Marketing Committees under Section 11(1)(i) of the Markets Act until a final order of winding up is passed; mere interim liquidation proceedings do not curtail their participation rights unless expressly provided by law.

Source excerpt

  • Participation in market committee elections
  • Liquidation proceedings of co-operative societies
  • Statutory rights of office bearers
  • Interpretation of gujarat agricultural produce markets act 1963
  • Interpretation of gujarat co-operative societies act 1961
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

CHEVITI VENKANNA YADAV versus STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.

The Telangana legislature had competence to pass retrospective amendments to the Markets Act, altering membership and tenure. The amendment validly removed distinctions between existing and future members, and changing 'appointed' to 'nominated' does not violate Article 14. Retrospective curtailment of tenure of nominated members is constitutional; there is no violation of vested rights, nor does the enactment qualify as colourable legislation.

Source excerpt

  • Legislative competence
  • Retrospective legislation
  • Colourable legislation
  • Equality under article 14
  • Statutory amendment and validation
Read case analysis
Administrative law

DELHI AGRJCULTURAL MARKETING BOARD versus HAKUMAT RAI

The respondent-writ petitioner has no legal right to allotment of a shop at Gazipur, as such shops are reserved for persons displaced from Shahadra. However, given the longstanding consideration of his claim, he may be considered with other eligible applicants for allotment of shop, subject to availability.

Source excerpt

  • Allotment of shops
  • Regulation of agricultural markets
  • Commission agent eligibility
  • Fairness in administrative action
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

India decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.