TUSHAR HIMATLAL JANI versus JASBIR SINGH VIJAN & ORS.
The High Court erred in restoring the interim injunction because Respondent No.1 failed to establish a prima facie case as the tenancy claim was sub judice before the Small Causes Court; the balance of convenience favored the Appellant given the small disputed area (550 sq ft of 22,000 sq ft) and existing redevelopment agreements, and the Appellant would suffer irreparable loss; therefore the appeal is allowed, the High Court order set aside, subject to reserving one 550 sq ft unit as security for the pending suit's outcome.
Source excerpt
- Interim injunction
- Tenancy dispute
- Balance of convenience
- Irreparable harm
- Family settlement agreement
- Leave and license agreement