THARAMMEL PEETHAMBARAN AND ANOTHER versus T. USHAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER
Exh.B-2 is a notarised photocopy (a mechanical/secondary copy) and the appellants failed to lay the necessary factual foundation or follow the statutory procedure for adducing secondary evidence under the Evidence Act; therefore Exh.B-2 is inadmissible to prove the execution/contents of the PoA or the extent of authority to alienate. The First Appellate Court erred in relying on Exh.B-2; the High Court correctly set aside that reliance and restored the Trial Court's finding that the sale deeds were invalid. The High Court's interference under Section 100/103 CPC was justified as it corrected…
Source excerpt
- Secondary evidence
- Power of attorney
- Photocopy as mechanical copy
- Section 85 evidence act
- Section 33 registration act
- Section 100 cpc