ISHWAR CHANDA SHARMA versus DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
The Supreme Court directed compliance with the High Court order dated 27.08.2024 requiring the Trial Court to reconsider receivership, and held that Receivers appointed for temples should preferably have relevant administrative experience and historical, religious and social background (preferably belonging to the Vaishnav Sampradaya) rather than being practising advocates; additionally, the State of Uttar Pradesh was permitted to implement its development Scheme for Banke Bihari Temple and to utilise amounts lying in fixed deposits of the Deity/Temple to acquire land for the corridor provide…
Source excerpt
- Appointment of receiver
- Eligibility of receivers
- Appointment of advocates as receivers
- Crowd management at temples
- Use of temple funds for development
- Acquisition and development of land for temple corridor