INDIAN COUNCIL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (ICSSR) versus NEETU GAUR & ORS.
The Court held that ICSSR was justified in withholding grants to CRRID in light of enquiries and committee findings of anomalies and non-compliance with Grant-in-Aid Rules; ICSSR's grant-making is discretionary under its rules permitting withholding or recovery on violation; the presence of nominees and grant funding does not amount to 'deep and pervasive' State control of CRRID under Article 12; there is no employer-employee relationship between ICSSR and CRRID employees, and CRRID must pay withheld salaries from its own resources, failing which ICSSR may withhold future grants.
Source excerpt
- Grant-in-aid
- Deep and pervasive control
- Article 12 (instrumentality of the state)
- Withholding of grants
- Employer-employee relationship
- Societies registration act, 1860