Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
India decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Supreme Court held that billing discrepancies and delayed medical records did not disclose criminal offences, and quashed the complaint under Section 482 CrPC.
The allegations showed that funds were advanced to make a movie on promise of sharing profits, the movie was completed and released, there were no allegations that the movie earned profits, and the post-dated cheques were issued to discharge an existing obligation; dishonour of post-dated cheques alone does not establish dishonest intention from inception; therefore the complaint disclosed only a civil cause of action and proceedings under Section 420 IPC were to be quashed.
Source excerpt
The High Court erred in refusing to quash the FIR and charge sheet because the allegations, even if accepted in entirety, disclose at best a civil/commercial dispute relating to loan, repayment and property and do not prima facie make out ingredients of offences under Sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC; the institution of multiple FIRs in quick succession and timing of the charge sheet, together with the conviction of the complainant under Section 138 N.I. Act, demonstrate mala fide prosecution and abuse of process, warranting quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Source excerpt
Because the National Building Code and the writ court order established that a Fire Department NOC was not required for educational buildings below 15 metres and the appellant's building was 14.20 metres, the alleged representation of possessing a valid NOC could not have induced the Education Department to grant recognition/renewal; consequently the essential ingredient of dishonest inducement for cheating under Section 420 IPC was absent. Further, there was no material showing the appellant had fabricated the document to attract forgery offences. Therefore the High Court's refusal to quash…
Source excerpt
None of the offences alleged against the appellants under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC were made out on the material; the criminal complaint was employed to abuse the process of law and to disguise a civil dispute as criminal, and therefore the proceedings in Complaint Case No.627 of 2002 were to be quashed in the interest of justice.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned FIR because the allegations disclosed a civil/commercial dispute without elements of criminality; there was no material showing the accused had an intention to cheat from inception, and the High Court erred in directing mediation conditioned on payment of Rs.25 lakh, which amounted to assisting recovery of money through criminal process rather than requiring the complainant to pursue appropriate civil remedies.
Source excerpt
The High Court's order quashing prosecution of respondent Nos.1 and 2 was set aside because a prima facie case for criminal conspiracy and cheating existed based on the creation and use of an allegedly forged family tree and partition deed to appropriate compensation; pendency of civil suits does not bar continuation of criminal proceedings where offences are made out, and the genuineness of documents must be tested at trial.
Source excerpt
The allegations in the impugned FIR, taken on their face value, disclose a purely commercial/civil dispute (the complainant admitted receipt of substantial part payment) and do not disclose the necessary ingredients of any cognizable offence; consequently allowing prosecution and the chargesheet to proceed would be a gross abuse of process, and the High Court order and all proceedings including the FIR and chargesheet are quashed.
Source excerpt
The appellant was not the authorized officer at the relevant time, had no involvement in the initiation of the auction or issuance of the sale certificate and was not a signatory; therefore the allegations against him did not attract criminal liability and continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process, warranting quashing of the criminal proceedings against him arising out of CC No. 308 of 2016.
Source excerpt
The High Court was correct to quash the FIR insofar as it alleged an offence under Section 306 IPC because, on the material, the allegations appeared to be afterthoughts and there was no reasonable proximate nexus between the alleged instigation and the deceased's suicide. However, the High Court erred in quashing the proceedings under Section 420 IPC without giving reasons addressing why the investigation material was insufficient to constitute cheating; accordingly the quash of Section 420 proceedings is set aside and the trial court directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
Source excerpt
Explore more
