RAVISH SINGH RANA versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
Because the parties, both adults, lived together and cohabited as a live-in couple for over two years, and the FIR did not allege that physical relations were established only due to a promise to marry, a presumption arises of valid consent; the settlement agreement corroborates consensual relationship, and therefore prosecution for rape on the ground of refusal to marry would be an abuse of process and the FIR and consequential proceedings are to be quashed.
Source excerpt
- Quashing
- Live-in relationships
- Consent
- Rape
- Settlement agreement
- Abuse of process