Sign in
India Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

India Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

India decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitution of india

ANUN DHAWAN & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Because the National Food Security Act, 2013 provides a comprehensive rights-based statutory framework (entitlements, lifecycle approach, monitoring and grievance redressal) and States/UTs have implemented various schemes under it, the Court will not direct States/UTs to implement Community Kitchens; matters of policy formulation and implementation are primarily for the executive and subject to limited judicial review confined to legality rather than wisdom.

  • Right to food
  • Right to life
  • Food and nutritional security
  • Community kitchens
  • Welfare scheme
  • Judicial review
Read case analysis
Labour law

IN RE: PROBLEMS AND MISERIES OF MIGRANT LABOURERS versus IN RE: PROBLEMS AND MISERIES OF MIGRANT LABOURERS

Because several States/Union Territories had failed to achieve prescribed targets for registration of unorganised workers on the NDUW/eShram portals despite centralised systems, the Court directed those States to cooperate with the Union Ministry of Labour and Employment and to complete registration within six weeks; further, noting that NFSA coverage is based on the 2011 census and that population has increased, the Court directed the Union to consider a formula or policy (including population projections for 2011-2021) so that NFSA benefits are not unduly restricted and to file a response.

  • Migrant labour
  • Unorganised workers registration
  • Eshram portal
  • National food security act, 2013
  • One nation one ration card
  • Right to food
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

DIPIKA JAGATRAM SAHANI versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

The Court held that the Centre and the States are constitutionally and statutorily obliged to implement Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the National Food Security Act, 2013 and to meet the nutritional standards in Schedule II; in view of the MWCD guidance of 11.11.2020 all Anganwadi Centres situated outside containment zones must be reopened by States/UTs unless the State Disaster Management Authority directs otherwise, centres in containment zones remain closed until containment continues, and States/UTs must ensure compliance with Schedule II and institute monitoring and district-level complaint red…

  • Anganwadi centres
  • National food security act, 2013
  • Integrated child development services
  • Right to food
  • Covid-19 pandemic
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

SWARAJ ABHIYAN - (II) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

The Court held that while it cannot mandate States to provide food items beyond statutory entitlements under the NFS Act, it can direct faithful implementation of the Act's provisions. States are obligated to make operational grievance redress machinery, provide food grains to all households in drought-affected areas, and ensure nutritional support for children under the Mid-Day Meal Scheme. Financial constraints cannot excuse these constitutional and statutory obligations.

  • Right to food
  • Implementation of national food security act
  • Drought relief
  • Mid-day meal scheme
  • Directive principles
Read case analysis
Constitutional law

PEOPLE'S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

States are directed to clear backlog and operationalize all Anganwadi Centres sanctioned up to September 2006 by 15.07.2007 (or 31.07.2007 for U.P.), and those sanctioned up to January 2007 by 30.09.2007; non-compliance of deadlines will be seriously viewed and States must file affidavits as per specified dates indicating action taken.

  • Integrated child development scheme
  • Anganwadi centres
  • Right to food
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

India decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.