M/S CHOPRA HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED versus HARBINDER SINGH SEKHON & ORS.
Where an interim order in a parent writ petition has been shown to be relied upon by authorities and to have direct and immediate civil consequences for a non‑party, that non‑party is a proper party and must be given an opportunity to be heard in those proceedings; the High Court’s refusal to implead the Appellant and to consider its request for clarification/modification was unsustainable, and overlapping but distinct proceedings (LPA No. 760 of 2026 and CR No. 2579 of 2026) need not be held in abeyance and can be heard independently while the Appellant is impleaded in the parent writ.
Source excerpt
- Impleadment in writ petition
- Writ proceedings
- Interim order
- Order i rule 10 cpc
- Section 269 punjab municipal corporation act, 1976
- Clarification/modification of interim order