Esheria India Case Law
Sign in
India Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

India Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter India case law

Results update automatically as you type.

India decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Contempt of court

CHADURANGA KANTHRAJ URS AND ANR. versus P. RAVI KUMAR AND ORS.

The Court found that respondents deliberately delayed and failed to implement the clear directions of this Court (orders dated 21.11.2014 and 17.05.2022) to issue TDR as per the TDR Rules and guidance/market value under Section 45B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957; respondents were held to have acted contumaciously in part, and the Court directed respondent authorities (BBMP/competent authority) to issue TDR in favour of respective claimants at the guidance values noticed in the judgment within six weeks, recalled the additional condition imposed by the Court's order dated 19.03.2024 to that…

Source excerpt

  • Wilful disobedience
  • Issuance of tdr
  • Compliance of court orders
  • Modification of orders
  • Valuation of land
  • Suppressio veri suggestio falsi
Read case analysis
Service law

A. P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus PRASADA RAO AND ORS.

Directions from the Tribunal and High Court were modified to restore the select list prepared by the A.P. Public Service Commission; candidates already appointed under notification No. 5/1998 may opt to retain existing positions or choose new posts, with options exercised within a timeframe set by the Commission; fresh appointees after this order are to be given option only once, and no fresh options for those who already exercised them; vacancies to be filled in accordance with merit and rules of reservation.

Source excerpt

  • Selection process
  • Select list
  • Appointment
  • Seniority
  • Option for post
  • Tribunal directions
Read case analysis
Labour law

WORKMEN OF M/S. BIRLA TEXTILES versus K.K. BIRLA AND ORS.

Since the factory at Baddi was not functional as assumed in the earlier order, the directions regarding the reporting and employment of workmen need modification to ensure fair implementation. The substance of earlier directions is retained, but the process is adapted so only 937 workmen are employed immediately, with corresponding payment and registration. Remaining workmen are also to report and receive regular wages during their unemployment, and contempt proceedings are closed in view of these modifications.

Source excerpt

  • Factory relocation
  • Implementation of judicial orders
  • Payment of wages
  • Contempt proceedings
  • Modification of orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

India decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.