Esheria India Case Law
Sign in
India Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

India Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter India case law

Results update automatically as you type.

India decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Service law

GURDAS SINGH AND OTHERS ETC. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

In the special facts and circumstances, teachers transferred from school to college who possess requisite qualifications and have performed equivalent duties for decades are entitled to pay scale parity with college lecturers even without State Level Eligibility Test, as such eligibility was not required at the time of their appointment or transfer.

Source excerpt

  • Parity of pay scales
  • College cadre vs school cadre
  • Qualifications for lecturers
  • Equal pay for equal work
Read case analysis
Service law

INDIA RAILWAY SAS STAFF ASSOCIATION AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Classification of posts into group 'B' or otherwise cannot be based solely on pay scales, as administrative, procedural, and hierarchical factors must also be considered; there is no discrimination in not granting group 'B' status to Accounts staff of Railways in the scale of Rs. 2000-3200, therefore appellants are not entitled to be placed in group 'B' status.

Source excerpt

  • Classification of posts
  • Parity of pay scales
  • Group 'b' status
  • Articles 14 and 16
Read case analysis
Service law

NAIN SINGH BHAKUNI AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

There cannot be automatic parity or linkage of retrospective revision of pay scales between CPWD and CWC draftsmen as there was a clear difference in recruitment qualifications up to 1987; Tribunal's grant of the benefit pursuant to the 1984 Office Memorandum was appropriate and cannot be further extended.

Source excerpt

  • Parity of pay scales
  • Discrimination
  • Retrospective revision of pay scales
  • Educational qualifications
  • Equal pay for equal work
Read case analysis
Service law

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. versus RAVI BALA AND ORS.

Teachers who acquired B.T./B.Ed. qualification on or after 9.3.1990 are not entitled to higher pay scales automatically, as the Government's policy is prospective in operation. Entitlement applies only to those who acquired the qualification prior to the cutoff date.

Source excerpt

  • Parity of pay scales
  • Acquisition of higher qualifications
  • Teachers' pay scales
  • Government policy instructions
Read case analysis
Service law

SRI SISIR KUMAR MOHANTY versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR.

The ministerial staff in district offices and those in head offices (DIG, IG, DGP) form a single unit under the 1974 resolution, and are entitled to parity in pay and benefits; the 1995 Rules operate only prospectively from February 24, 1995.

Source excerpt

  • Parity of pay scales
  • Ministerial staff pay parity
  • Application of government resolutions
  • Prospective operation of rules
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

India decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.