Att. Gen. v James [2013] 1 JLR_Note 18 (03 May 2013)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings / Sanction for Professional Misconduct
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined the appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by an advocate.
Court disposition
sanction imposed
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ApplicantJames
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings / Sanction for Professional Misconduct
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by advocate
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey Law Reports
Sanctions for professional misconduct must uphold public confidence in the legal profession.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined the appropriate sanction for professional misconduct by an advocate.
Court disposition
sanction imposed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Att. Gen. v James [2013] 1 JLR_Note 18 (03 May 2013) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2013/JLR13N118.html Cite as: [2013] 1 JLR_Note 18 [ New search ] [ Help ] Att. Gen. v James 2013 (1) JLR Note 18 (03 May 2013) Advocates-disciplinary proceedings-sanction for professional misconduct The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2013 (1) JLR Note 18 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2013/JLR13N118.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.