Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Jersey decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Abramovich v Chief Minister of Jersey and Ors (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Cadin : Directions)) [2026] JRC 094 (13 April 2026)
Directions hearing in a sanctions-related judicial review. The Royal Court ordered a timetable and kept the asset freeze in place pending the substantive claim.
Representation of HM Attorney General Re: Steenson (Royal Court : Hearing (Civil) : Le Cocq : Disciplinary) [2025] JRC 207 (6 August 2025)
The Royal Court of Jersey suspended Advocate David Samuel Steenson from practice for three months after his common-assault conviction brought the profession into disrepute.
XY and A Limited v Chief Officer of the States of the States of Jersey Police [2023] JRC 016 (23 January 2023)
The Royal Court awarded standard costs after judicial review proceedings were discontinued by consent, refusing indemnity costs despite unlawful search warrants.
Between v An Advocate [2021] JRC 292 (19 November 2021)
The Royal Court dismissed the Law Society’s appeal in an advocate discipline case, upheld the key approach to appeal scrutiny, and held Rule 3.5(c) applied to court conduct.
Siciles C. de Bourbon des Deux v BNP Paribas Jersey Trust Corporation Limited [2021] JCA 163 (08 June 2021)
Court of Appeal upheld contempt sanctions against Camilla de Bourbon des Deux Siciles, rejecting claims of bias, procedural unfairness, and disproportionate penalty.
Sinel and Chiddicks -v- AG [2015] JCA 192 (07 October 2015)
The Court of Appeal upheld findings that two advocates deliberately misled it by not disclosing a protective writ, but reduced one sanction from suspension to a public reprimand.
Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police -v- The Panel of Jurats [2014] JRC 114B (21 May 2014)
The Royal Court dismissed a judicial review challenge to a police discipline appeal decision, upholding a reduced sanction for PC X and refusing publication of the private appeal reasons.
Att. Gen. v James [2013] 1 JLR_Note 18 (03 May 2013)
Disciplinary proceedings against an advocate concerning the sanction for professional misconduct and the need to protect public confidence in the profession.
Att. Gen. v Begg [2012] 2 JLR 342 (13 November 2012)
Sanction-only disciplinary proceedings against an advocate for serious misconduct. The court imposed a ÂŁ25,000 fine for assisting a breach of curatorship and deception.
The Royal Court found Advocate Le Quesne committed professional misconduct by using client account funds to pay TGWU fee notes, and fined him ÂŁ10,000.
Explore more
