Jersey Judgment

Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626 (26 October 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

In sentencing for importation of Class A drugs in tablet or unit form, the number of units and the defendant's involvement or role are the principal factors; purity is only relevant if very high or dangerous impurities are present, and street value is less important.

Court disposition

guideline judgment issued

02

Material facts

Parties

Bonnar

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Sentencing Guidelines

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

What are the principal factors to consider in sentencing for importation of Class A drugs in tablet or unit form?

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant likely argued for consideration of drug purity and street value in sentencing.
Respondent
Respondent likely argued that number of units and defendant's role are principal factors, with purity and street value being less important.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626

    Number of units and defendant's involvement or role are the principal factors in sentencing for importation of Class A drugs in tablet or unit form.

  2. 02

    Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626

    Purity of drugs should not be considered unless it is very high or dangerous impurities are added.

  3. 03

    Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626

    Street value is a less important factor in sentencing.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

In sentencing for importation of Class A drugs in tablet or unit form, the number of units and the defendant's involvement or role are the principal factors; purity is only relevant if very high or dangerous impurities are present, and street value is less important.

Court disposition

guideline judgment issued

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2001] JLR 626

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626 (26 October 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010626.html Cite as: [2001] JLR 626 [ New search ] [ Help ] Bonnar v Att. Gen. 2001 JLR 626 (26 October 2001) Criminal Law-drugs-importation-sentence-Class A drugs in tablet or unit form-number of units and defendant's involvement or role are principal factors-court not to consider purity of drugs unless purity very high or dangerous impurities added-street value less important factor The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR 626 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010626.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.