Sign in
Jersey Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Jersey Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
0 court collections
Last checked

Jersey decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal law [2025] JRC 270

AG v Arnett and Leeming (Royal Court : Sentencing

AG v Arnett and Leeming (Royal Court : Sentencing (Criminal) : Le Cocq) [2025] JRC 270 (17 October 2025)

The Royal Court sentenced two defendants to 5 years each for importing cocaine into Jersey with intent to supply, applying Rimmer guidance on Class A drug sentencing.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing
  • Class a drugs
  • Drug-importation
  • Class-a-drugs
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2022] JRC 213

AG v Mitchell

AG v Mitchell [2022] JRC 213 (11 October 2022)

Sentencing judgment for importing 112.25 grams of high-purity cocaine. The court applied Rimmer v AG, adjusted for courier role, prior convictions, and mitigation, and imposed 7 years' imprisonment.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Class a drugs
  • Drug-importation
  • Sentencing-guidelines
  • Class-a-drugs
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2021] JRC 121

AG v Duffy 22-Apr-2021

AG v Duffy 22-Apr-2021 [2021] JRC 121 (22 April 2021)

Sentencing for possession with intent to supply oxycodone and THC. The court imposed 4 years 9 months’ imprisonment and made confiscation and forfeiture orders.

  • Drug offences
  • Possession with intent to supply
  • Class a drugs
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Confiscation order
  • Forfeiture
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Steven David Herring

The Royal Court sentenced Steven David Herring to 4 years for importing 82.4 grams of high-purity heroin, with forfeiture and destruction ordered.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Heroin
  • Class a drugs
  • Courier role
  • Mitigation
  • Forfeiture and destruction
Read case analysis
Criminal law

The Attorney General v Cedric Joel Conord

The Royal Court sentenced Cedric Joel Conord for importing cocaine and heroin, rejecting a social-supply account and imposing concurrent terms of 6 and 6½ years.

  • Importation of controlled drugs
  • Cocaine
  • Heroin
  • Class a drugs
  • Concurrent sentences
  • Forfeiture and destruction
Read case analysis
Criminal law

Mcfarland v Att. Gen.

Mcfarland v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR_Note 34 (15 July 2004)

Sentencing note on possession with intent to supply Class A drugs, stressing that the penalty must reflect the seriousness of the offence.

  • Drugs
  • Possession with intent to supply
  • Sentencing
  • Class a drugs
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2004] JLR 179

Finnigan v Att. Gen.

Finnigan v Att. Gen. [2004] JLR 179 (04 May 2004)

Sentencing guidance on importing a small quantity of Class A drugs: the starting point should be lower where the drugs were for personal use, not commercial supply.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Class a drugs
  • Drug-importation
  • Sentencing-guidelines
  • Class-a-drugs
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2001] JLR 626

Bonnar v Att. Gen.

Bonnar v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 626 (26 October 2001)

Sentencing guideline judgment on importation of Class A drugs in tablet form, holding that the number of units and the offender’s role are the main factors.

  • Drug importation
  • Sentencing
  • Class a drugs
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-importation
  • Class-a-drugs
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2001] JRC 172

AG v Noon

AG v Noon [2001] JRC 172 (02 August 2001)

Sentencing for importation of 2,258 ecstasy tablets: the court declined to adopt proposed guideline tables and sentenced Noon and Mrs. Noon on case-specific facts.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Class a drugs
  • Importation of ecstasy
  • Drug-trafficking
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2001] JLR 395

Forrester v Att. Gen.

Forrester v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 395 (19 July 2001)

Criminal appeal on sentence for possession with intent to supply Class A drugs. The court held that a seven-year starting point was appropriate for 56 Ecstasy tablets.

  • Drugs
  • Possession with intent to supply
  • Sentencing
  • Class a drugs
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Jersey decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.